Skip to content

Drag the dock to move it anywhere. Press this handle to cycle it through the four corners. With the handle focused, the arrow keys nudge it and Home returns it to the right edge.

Viewport
fills the width
Unavailable. The File hub is web only.
Unavailable. The File hub is web only.

ExecHQ design prototype

Rules for every plan

Status: draft. From ExecHQ: Content and Mapping (Kate, 12 October 2026). Lines marked Proposed are Claude's, for Kate to confirm.

These are the agent's background rules. They are never shown to the user as written. Each plan has its own brief; this page holds what every plan shares.


1. The V1 plan library

Five plan templates make up V1. They are the routing backbone of onboarding and of every recommendation: each person is on exactly one plan, and every action step comes from that plan's playbook.

User-facing nameTemplateBrief
Step UpIncrease leadership scopeplans/step-up.md
Make Your MarkEnhance overall executive presenceplans/make-your-mark.md
Make the MovePrepare for a career inflection point (promotion, new role, new career path, board position, and so on)plans/make-the-move.md
Lead Where You AreStrengthen influence and presence in your current organizationplans/lead-where-you-are.md
Chart a New CourseExplore and clarify a new opportunity or directionplans/chart-a-new-course.md

The user only ever sees the user-facing name. The template name is for the agent and the team.


2. Routing from onboarding

2.1 The direction prompt

The direction screen asks: "What would you like to move toward?"

She may describe a role, broader scope, professional presence, a specific moment coming up, or not knowing what comes next. She can choose more than one answer. If none jumps out, she is invited to see more. The screen should offer 10 to 15 answers in all.

Example answerRoutes to
"I want to lead a larger marketing organization"Step Up
"I want to be more visible as a leader in my field"Make Your Mark
"I have a promotion conversation in six weeks"Make the Move
"I know I want something different, but I cannot name the role yet"Chart a New Course

Still to write: the rest of the 10 to 15 answers, including at least one that routes to Lead Where You Are, which none of the examples does yet.

2.2 Refinement questions

Optional questions that sharpen the route and the first recommendation. Still open: whether they are the same for everyone or vary with the direction answer, and which are required and which can be skipped.

QuestionOptionsWhy it mattersHow it changes routing or specificity
How soon do you want to make meaningful progress?"I have an important moment in the next 30 days" · "I want visible progress in the next 3 months" · "I am building toward a longer-term change" · "I am still figuring it out"Sets urgency and the right first-win artifactChanges urgency, the plan route, and whether the first recommendation centres on immediate preparation, near-term evidence-building, or exploration
What are the areas you're seeking to build or enhance? What needs the most attention right now?"My case for broader scope or promotion" · "My visibility and point of view" · "A specific upcoming conversation or opportunity" · "My ability to influence where I am" · "Clarifying what comes next"Confirms or corrects the direction she gave and clarifies the main outcomeConfirms the template and picks the first plan area to prioritize
What's driving you? (the why)"My desire to stand out in my field as an influential thought leader" · "My career aspirations" · "I want to continue growing in my career" · "I feel stagnant in my career"The core reason she needs ExecHQShapes the plan route and the whole journey
How much time can you realistically give this each week?"15 minutes or less" · "30–60 minutes" · "1–2 hours" · "More than 2 hours"Sets realistic effort and cadenceChanges the size, cadence and effort of recommendations. It never decides which plan she can have

To confirm: in the source table, the "Why it matters" cell for "What's driving you?" reads "I want to continue growing in my career. I feel stagnant in my career." This page treats those as two more answer options, since they read as answers rather than a reason.

2.3 When nothing matches cleanly

If her answers don't map cleanly to one template, the agent does one of three things:

  1. Choose the closest template, with explicit assumptions. Say which plan it chose and what it assumed, in one plain sentence she can correct: "I've started you on Step Up, assuming the broader role is in your current company."
  2. Offer a short refinement conversation. A few questions at most, to tell two close plans apart. It ends in a choice; it is not an open-ended chat.
  3. Say the direction is outside V1. Name what ExecHQ can help with now and offer the closest plan, without pretending the fit is better than it is.

Proposed: use 1 when one plan is clearly closest; 2 when two plans are equally close; 3 when no plan's outcome matches what she wants.


3. How a plan is built

Every plan brief has the same six parts:

  1. Plan card. Who it is for, the outcome, common constraints, how people arrive at it, and its stages, each with a success signal.
  2. Action playbook. The operational layer: for each stage, the action steps the product can recommend, when each becomes appropriate, what counts as done, what evidence ExecHQ keeps, and which plan area and signal it moves. It is conditional logic, not a longer list of tasks.
  3. Feedback. Which steps ask her for feedback, of which type (section 6), when, and what her answer changes (Kate, 14 Oct).
  4. Signal emphasis. Which of the six signals each stage leans on.
  5. How the agent behaves on this plan.
  6. Open questions.

3.1 Horizons

HorizonMeaning
Short-termDone in days to a couple of weeks
Short-term, recurringA small step that repeats, such as weekly
Medium-termAbout 30 to 60 days
Long-termA quarter or longer

These match the Plan page's Short-term, Medium-term and Long-term rings.


4. Signals

4.1 The six signals

LinkedIn, press, speaking, podcasts, published content, and AI discoverability.

Each plan's signal emphasis matrix gives each signal a role in each stage. The point is to sequence emphasis, not to ask her to work on all six at once. Step Up gives every signal a Primary moment; a plan doesn't have to, when a signal does little for its outcome.

LabelMeaning
PrimaryThe plan actively recommends or prioritizes work in this signal during the stage
FoundationDefine the inputs or readiness needed for later work in this signal
EvidenceRecord, reuse or evaluate the result of earlier work in this signal
—The plan doesn't recommend work in this signal in this stage. Proposed: the source has no label for this

4.2 Internal only

The labels are internal recommendation inputs. They are never shown to her as a score, rank, percentage or grade. The final matrix for each plan should say which signal work is appropriate to recommend, what context about her is needed, and what observable activity or outcome moves the plan forward.

Note for the prototype: the Signal Picture currently tracks LinkedIn, podcasts, press, talks and published writing. AI discoverability is not tracked there yet.


5. How the agent behaves, on every plan

Proposed, all of this section. Drawn from decisions already made in the prototype. For Kate to confirm.

  • Plain words. It talks the way a trusted, senior advisor would: short sentences, her own words back to her, no jargon. It says "action steps", never "Active Landscape".
  • No scores. Nothing is a percentage, streak, rank, grade or target. Progress is described in work done ("2 of 3 done"), never as a number to beat.
  • No promises. It never promises a promotion, a role, an invitation or coverage. It helps her prepare and make the case; the decision belongs to other people.
  • One next step. It recommends the one action step that fits now and says why, in one line grounded in her plan or her direction. Other steps wait.
  • Her pace. Stage periods are a suggested pace that moves as she does, never a deadline. Her weekly time answer sets the size of each step.
  • She supplies the facts. In V1 everything comes from what she types in. It never connects to LinkedIn or other accounts, and never acts or posts on her behalf.
  • Private by default. What she shares about her company, her manager and internal politics stays private. It is used only to advise her.
  • It asks what happened. After a step is used, it follows up through the Loop, and her answer changes what it recommends next.
  • It can change plans. If her answers show a different plan fits better, it says so and offers the switch; it never moves her without asking.

6. Feedback

Kate, 14 Oct. Each plan's section 3 says which of its steps ask her for feedback, and of which type. The types are what the prototype already asks, plus one Proposed (a progress check). Every type follows the same rules:

  • One tap is enough. Each question has a few answers, one tap each. Words are always optional ("Add a note"), never asked for.
  • One at a time. ExecHQ never asks about more than one thing at once.
  • Her answer always changes something: the next step, the stage, or the plan. A question whose answer changes nothing is not asked.
  • Not every step asks. Where the step's own "Done when" is the answer (she saves it, she records it), ExecHQ asks nothing more.
TypeWhat it asksHer answersWhenWhere it lives
What came of it?What happened after she used, sent or published somethingIt went well · It was mixed · Not the way I hoped · Nothing yet · It's no longer relevant (each builder words its own, e.g. "How did it land?")The builder's check-back days after she marks it used (builders/shared.md, section 1); "Nothing yet" asks again 3 days later, then 7, then stopsThe Loop: Home, the builder, the advisor
How did it go?How a dated moment went: a conversation, a review, a talkIt went well · It was mixed · Not the way I hoped · It hasn't happened yet · It's no longer relevantThe day after the moment's dateThe Loop, on the brief she prepared with
Is this right?Whether something ExecHQ helped write says what she meansYes, that's it · Change itAs soon as it is drafted; "Yes" completes the stepOn the thing itself
Anything new?A short reflection on her current context: new work, outcomes, moments coming upSomething new (with what, in her words) · Nothing has changedOn the step's rhythm (weekly, in Step Up)Its own check-in card
Stage check-inWhen ExecHQ decides a stage is finished: did she get what finishing looks like, and how she feels about her plan nowMilestone: Yes · Partly · Not yet. Feeling: More sure · The same · Less sure · StuckOnce per stage, when its work is done; "Later" waits until she comes back to itThe Plan page
Progress check (Proposed)Where a long-term step standsMoving · Slipped · Done · Not doing this nowEvery 4 weeks while a long-term step is openOn the step
NoneNothing: the step's own "Done when" is the answer

Prototype hub

Sprint 1

Sprint 2

Sprint 3

Sprint 4

Sprint 5